Legal Opinion

United States v. Jeffery Havis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2019No. 17-5772PublishedCited by 234 opinions

1Per curiam

Although it is neither a legislature nor a court, the United States Sentencing Commission plays a major role in criminal sentencing. But Congress has placed careful limits on the way the Commission exercises that power. Jeffery Havis argues that the Commission stepped beyond those limits here and, as a result, he deserves to be resentenced. We agree and REVERSE the decision of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

In 2017, Havis pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). Under the Sentencing Guidelines, a person convicted under § 922(g)(1) starts with a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by234 opinions

  1. Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Dwight Bullard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Trey CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  4. United States v. Brandon Romel DupreeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. Jennifer RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API