Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Goess

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 4, 1935No. 90PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Goess, the appellee, is the receiver of a national bank, and against him Willcox, the trustee in bankruptcy, has brought a number of suits, still pending; he is also a creditor of the estate. As such, he obtained from the referee an order to examine one Hughes, on whose information Willcox relied, at least in part, in preparing his suits, and who, it is to be assumed, has told Willcox all that he knows, or at least all that Willcox wishes to learn. Goess’ only possible purpose in asking for the examination is therefore to prepare his defense to the suits. Willcox moved before the referee to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re AndrewsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. In Re Winton Shirt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. In Re LarkhamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1982
  4. Stein v. Elizabeth Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  5. Hilles v. WisemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API