In Re the Arbitration Between Cuzdey & American Motorists Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Both courts below were vested with discretion to be exercised in the light of all the facts and relevant circumstances in the given case, reviewable to a limited extent in this court. We are not disposed to overrule the exercise of discretion by the Appellate Division. (Cf. Murray v City of New York, 30 NY2d 113.)
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & JimenezNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Home Indemnity Co. v. MessanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Eveready Insurance v. SaundersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re the Arbitration between Country-Wide Insurance & IhneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In re the Arbitration between Travelers Insurance & FordNew York Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.