Legal Opinion

Howard v. Jones

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1990No. 89-CA-1651PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

Plaintiffs, purchasers of certain immovable property, appeal the trial court judg*699ment dismissing their suit to annul the sale and for return of the purchase price and in the alternative for partition of certain immovable property sold to defendant, Maxine Young. The issue is whether plaintiffs have stated a cause and/or right of action on the grounds of lesion beyond moiety against Maxine Young, purchaser of a one-half interest in the property included in the subsequent sale to plaintiffs. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

On November 4,1987, plaintiffs, Dorothy…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. ReadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Belcher & Creswell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  3. Fabre v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Clark v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howard v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API