Legal Opinion

In re Grand Jury

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 13, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charge to the grand jury by

MORROW, District Judge:

*841Gentlemen of the Grand Jury: You have been summoned and sworn as grand jurors of the district court of the United States for the northern district of California. It now becomes my duty to instruct you concerning the duties you will be called upon to perform under the laws of the United States.

The extraordinary occurrences in this state during the past two weeks require your immediate attention, and call for a thorough and sweeping investigation. It is a matter of public notoriety that during this time a great railroad strike has prevailed;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. United States v. PattersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1893
  5. Pittsburgh, Ft. Wayne & Chicago R. R. v. HazenIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bluejacket v. EwertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  2. Averill v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1896
  3. United States v. HaleyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1958
  4. McKinney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API