Legal Opinion

Af-Cap, Inc. v. Republic of Congo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 3, 2004No. 03-50506, 03-50560Published

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: 2

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order of September 29, 2004, granting Appellant’s motion to issue the mandate forthwith is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ap-pellee’s alternative motion to recall the mandate pending consideration of the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED. Our decision that the Garnishees’ intangible obligations to the Congo had been used for commercial purposes in the United States in the past, and thus were subject to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Af-Cap Inc v. Republic of CongoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Af-Cap Inc. v. The Republic of Congo Cms Oil and Gas Co., Garnishees, Cms Nomeco Congo Inc. The Nuevo Congo Co. Nuevo Congo Ltd., Garnishees-Appellees. Af-Cap Inc. v. The Republic of CongoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API