State v. Perdue, Unpublished Decision (5-24-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Clinton Perdue appeals the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court, denying his motion for a new trial. The issue before us is whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining that a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence was not warranted. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
{¶ 2} In September 1988, two people were killed and one person was seriously wounded in a shooting at Cassandra Fant's apartment in Youngstown. Appellant was indicted for this incident. Also…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Toledo v. EasterlingOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. BradleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. IrwinOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. TebelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. HattonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.