Ross and Brooks v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Judge.
M. L. Brooks and Claude Ross were jointly indicted for possessing mash, material, equipment and supplies for manufacturing intoxicating liquor. They were tried jointly and- both were convicted and the punishment of each fixed at one year in the penitentiary.(1) Officers secured a warrant to search the “Old Tom Ross Ranch House” based upon an affidavit which stated in positive terms ■ that “Claude Ross and other unknown persons” possessed a still and material for the purpose of making intoxicating liquor. The affidavit then continued with the following averment: “same — (the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chapin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Craft v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Laake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Shuffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Spain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.