Legal Opinion

Ramantanin v. Poulos

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 9, 1962No. 17883PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

The issues in this case concern the claim of the plaintiff, Alexander Ramantanin, to ownership of á house and lot, title to which was formerly held by his father, John. Ramantanin. At the time of his death, on February 20,. 1959, John Ramantanin held title to a house and lot in Spartanburg, South Carolina, referred to in the record as theAsheville Highway property. Under the residuary clause-of his will, this property was devised to his wife, Daphne.. She died on April 5, 1959 and title to the house and lot-in question passed to the defendant, Valencia M. Poulos, as. the sole…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Babb v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  2. Privette v. GarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  3. Jannino v. JanninoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Main v. MuncasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Carmichael v. HugginsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lollis v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Grossman v. GrossmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Baptist Foundation for Christian Education v. Baptist CollegeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Hodges v. HodgesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  5. Martin v. CarterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API