Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Hoveling

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1969No. 37031PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.

Plaintiff, pleading the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, sued to recover for personal injuries resulting from a gunshot while hunting. Defendant pleaded a general denial, contributory negligence, and assumption of risk. Verdict and judgment were entered for defendant. We affirm the judgment.

The record discloses that plaintiff, defendant, and two other men were engaged in hunting pheasants. They lined up abreast and proceeded south through a field *561sown to brome grass which stood 18 to 24 inches in height. A creek bed approximately 15 feet deep meandered in a southerly direction through the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Naegele v. DollenNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Beveridge v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF ROADSNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Edmunds v. RipleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garreans Ex Rel. Garreans v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Lynn v. METROPOLITAN UTILITIES DISTRICTNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Swearingen v. SloggettNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Freeman v. RoseNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Garreans Ex Rel. Garreans v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API