Legal Opinion

Lee v. Belcher

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1964No. 2 Div. 447PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $3,130. A motion for a new trial was overruled. Appellee has filed a motion to affirm or dismiss the appeal because of the inadequacy of the appellant’s brief. The motion is granted.

Counsel for appellant is different from counsel who represented him at trial and at the hearing on the motion for a new trial.

*385The argument section of appellant’s brief appears on less than one and one-half pages of legal paper. No assignment of error is referred to, no proposition of law is adverted to and nowhere in the entire brief or the five…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Suits v. GloverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Pappas v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Boles v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Schneider v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Melton v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Wilson v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Lee v. BelcherAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API