Legal Opinion

Pau v. Pau

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 30, 1988No. 88-2058PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THREADGILL, Judge.

The former husband files this interlocutory appeal, claiming error in the denial of his motions for contribution or setoff and for stay of the sale of joint property. We affirm the order of the trial court.

In this bifurcated dissolution, the court entered an order dissolving the marriage of the parties on June 15, 1987. Thereafter, on July 14, 1987, the court entered its Order Regarding Financial Issues containing the following provisions pertinent to this appeal:

2. As to the joint Carrollwood property, the Husband may pay to the Wife within one (1) year the sum equivalent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Davis v. DieujusteSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Harrell v. HarrellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Mintz v. EllisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fullerton v. FullertonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. State v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Lawlor v. LawlorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API