United States v. Coleman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Keahmbi Coleman challenges his sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) on the ground that a violation or attempted violation of Ohio’s third-degree burglary statute, O.R.C. § 2911.12(A)(3), is not categorically a “violent felony.” See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B). Because the burglary or attempted burglary of an “occupied structure” creates a risk of physical injury that is similar to the risk posed by generic burglary, the offense is categorically violent under the residual “otherwise” clause of § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). The district court therefore…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Victor StittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Jesse PawlakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Paul PraterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Tracy Greer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Richard BrumbackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.