Legal Opinion

United States v. Coleman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2011No. 10-3205PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Keahmbi Coleman challenges his sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) on the ground that a violation or attempted violation of Ohio’s third-degree burglary statute, O.R.C. § 2911.12(A)(3), is not categorically a “violent felony.” See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B). Because the burglary or attempted burglary of an “occupied structure” creates a risk of physical injury that is similar to the risk posed by generic burglary, the offense is categorically violent under the residual “otherwise” clause of § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). The district court therefore…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Victor StittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Jesse PawlakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Paul PraterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Tracy Greer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Richard BrumbackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API