Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Alfortish v. Pailet

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1920No. 7850Published

1Concurrence

*64MRS. ALFORTISH VS ELIAS PAILET

No. 7850

CHARLES P. CLAIBORNE, JUDGE.

I concur in the opinion and decree herein upon the ¶' additional ground that plaintiff has received no considerable: for the money she has paid the defendant. If the defendant herein, after agreeing to sell the land to the plaintiff had refused to deliver it, or if^for any reason^delivery had become impossible, there is no question that «could not have demanded the price of sale, because the consideration of the sale would have been wanting. I cannot see the difference between that cpndition of affairs and the condition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. His CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
  2. McFadden v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API