Legal Opinion

Estate of Schwartz v. Dunishtock

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 6, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGoldstein, J.

Motion by Brooklyn Edison Company, Inc., pursuant to section 787 of the Civil Practice Act, to vacate an ex parte order made by a justice of this court requiring it to appear as a witness in the supplementary proceedings for examination “ concerning the addresses ” of the judgment debtor, and to produce all books, papers or records in its possession or control concerning the judgment debtor’s “ home addresses ” for the past twelve years. The judgment debtor is variantly identified in the caption of the proceeding.

The affidavit upon which the order for the examination of the witness was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. In re Pacific Railway CommissionU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1887
  3. Buell v. . Van CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Massachusetts v. KlausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. People ex rel. Grant v. WarnerNew York Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paalge, Inc. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API