Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Williamsport & North Branch Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1896No. Appeal, No. 52PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal, No. 52, July Term, 1895, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. County, March T., 1895, No. 153, setting aside service of summons. Rule to set aside service of process. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was order making absolute rule to set aside service of process.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

The defendant is a duly chartered corporation of the commonwealth ; its road is about forty-five miles in length and is located *116wholly in the counties of Lycoming and Sullivan; its principal office is in Hughesville, Lycoming county, and it has no agent, office or property in Philadelphia county. The treasurer of the company, J. H. Cochran, resides in Williamsport, Lycoming county. On the 21st of April, 1894, plaintiff, while a passenger on one of defendant’s trains, was seriously injured in a collision; averring her injury was caused by the negligence of defendant,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hawn v. Pennsylvania Canal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Park Brothers & Co. v. Oil City Boiler WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Mazurek v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. DeHaas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Eline v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Loraine v. Pittsburg, Johnstown, Ebensburg & Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API