Legal Opinion

Tiffany v. Tiffany

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 24, 1948No. 32927Published

1Opinion

Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing.

2Per curiam

In plaintiff in error’s petition for rehearing, it is insisted that the dismissal in action No. 72,333 came too late because in the argument or discussion between the- court and counsel, and before the granting of additional time to brief therein, the trial judge had indicated his view of the law or his conclusion or his thought against the position of plaintiff in that action. It is insisted that it was then too late for plaintiff to dismiss his action under the applicable statute, though the court did not render judgment against plaintiff or enter any order…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Owens v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. White v. Tulsa Iron & Metal Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Baize v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API