Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bifano

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 1959No. 3684PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff Smith brought this suit against defendant Bifano under Article 4004, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., to recover damages because of misrepresentations made by defendant to plaintiff concerning the foundation of a house which was purchased by plaintiff from defendant. By agreement of the parties the Trial Court submitted the case to the jury on a general charge. The jury found in favor of plaintiff and fixed his damages at $3,000. Plaintiff and defendant both filed motions for judgment. The Trial Court granted defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Olds v. TraylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  2. Plains Cotton Cooperative Ass'n v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. McCrary v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Brown v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. City of Houston v. Howe & WiseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API