Legal Opinion
Walter E. Heller & Co., Inc. v. Hammond
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 3, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
52 N.J. Super. 332 (1958)
145 A.2d 499
WALTER E. HELLER & COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION, ASSIGNEE OF THE PEERLESS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
HARRY HAMMOND, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS HAMMOND APPLIANCE TELEVISION AND REFRIGERATION CO., DEFENDANT, AND THE HAMMOND APPLIANCE CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 14, 1958.
Decided November 3, 1958.
Before Judges PRICE, SCHETTINO and HALL.
Mr. Samuel B. Feld argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant and cross-respondent.
M…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, Hudson CountySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Ballard County Bank's Assignee v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Cannon v. ChadwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Goldenstein v. Marlboro Construction Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Paul Gerli & Co. v. Mistletoe Silks MillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Fablok Mills v. Cocker MacH. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Royce Chemical Company v. Sharples CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Fablok Mills, Inc. v. COCKER MACHINE & FOUNDRYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Royce Chemical Company v. Sharples CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961