Legal Opinion

Clinchfield Fuel Co. v. W. M. Lundy & Son

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from Chancery Court, Washington County. —Hal H. Haynes, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buchanan

This was a suit by the Fuel Company against W. M. and Terry H. Lundy, as partners trading under the firm name and style of W. M. Lundy & Son. The chancellor granted a decree against W. M. Lundy for $2,100.86, principal, and certain interest) which added to the principal amounted to the sum of $2,307.36, and one-half of the costs of the cause, and a decree against complainant for the other one-half of the costs. There was no appeal by W. M. Lundy from the above portion of the decree, and no appeal by complainant from the part of the decree taxing it with one-half of the costs. The chancellor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prewitt v. BunchTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Dean & Co. v. CollinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lindley v. SewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Martinez v. McGregor-Doniger, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API