Legal Opinion

Orth v. Featherly

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The plaintiff is a merchant carrying on a general business in the towns of Au Sable, Oscoda, and St. Ignaee. The defendant is the proprietor and publisher of the Lakeside Monitor, published at Au Sable.

*316This is an action of libel, brought upon the following article published in defendant’s paper, July 9, 1887:

“George Orth in Deep Water.
“ In the Monitor of last week there were propounded to George Orth several very pertinent questions, among which was one wherein Orth was asked if he, as supervisor of the poor, ever furnished supplies to the inmates of the Shore Hospital, and charged them up to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guard v. RiskIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hinkle v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. Burt v. McBainMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Morris v. LachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Newman v. SteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Callahan v. IngramSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Peisner v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. New York Evening Post Co. v. ChalonerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  4. Prewitt v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Earley v. WinnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API