Cincinnati Insurance v. Allen
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MCCUSKEY, District Judge.
This case is before the court for ruling on cross motions for judgment on the pleadings.' Following this court’s careful review of the documents submitted by the parties and the arguments of the parties, this court rules as follows: (1) Defendant Timothy Allen’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (# 5) is DENIED; and (2) Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (# 9) is GRANTED.
FACTS
On October 22, 2004, Plaintiff, Cincinnati Insurance Company, filed its Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (# 1) against Defendants, Timothy Allen and Sean Blankenship.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Thornton v. PaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Julie Alexander, Carmel G. Abbate, Bozeman Anderson v. City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Essex Insurance v. Soy City Sock Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
- Rockhill Insurance Company v. Carri Scharf Materials Company, an Illinois corporationDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2019