Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance v. Allen

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided December 8, 2004No. 2:04-cv-02227PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MCCUSKEY, District Judge.

This case is before the court for ruling on cross motions for judgment on the pleadings.' Following this court’s careful review of the documents submitted by the parties and the arguments of the parties, this court rules as follows: (1) Defendant Timothy Allen’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (# 5) is DENIED; and (2) Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (# 9) is GRANTED.

FACTS

On October 22, 2004, Plaintiff, Cincinnati Insurance Company, filed its Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (# 1) against Defendants, Timothy Allen and Sean Blankenship.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Thornton v. PaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Julie Alexander, Carmel G. Abbate, Bozeman Anderson v. City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Essex Insurance v. Soy City Sock Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. Rockhill Insurance Company v. Carri Scharf Materials Company, an Illinois corporationDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API