Legal Opinion

Bank of America, N.A. (USA) v. Stine

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 12, 2000No. CIV.JFM-99-3678PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOTZ, Chief Judge.

This bankruptcy appeal presents the question of whether a Chapter 7 bankruptcy debtor, exercising the avoidance power conferred upon him by 11 U.S.C. § 522(h), may recover wages garnished by a judg ment creditor within the ninety-day preference period. The bankruptcy court, answering this question in the affirmative, held that the debtor, Kenneth W. Stine, was entitled to recover $1,064.05 that Nati-onsBank had obtained from him pursuant to wage attachments. I find that Stine may avoid the garnishments as preferential transfers but that he must count the $1,064.05…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. Herridge (In Re Humphrey)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1993
  2. Smoot v. Swann Hill Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n (In Re Smoot)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of America v. StineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Selby v. Allfirst Bank (In Re Selby)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  3. Susquehanna Financial v. Norcia (In Re Norcia)District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  4. In Re: Kenneth W. Stine, Debtor, Kenneth W. Stine v. NationsbankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API