Bank of America, N.A. (USA) v. Stine
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTZ, Chief Judge.
This bankruptcy appeal presents the question of whether a Chapter 7 bankruptcy debtor, exercising the avoidance power conferred upon him by 11 U.S.C. § 522(h), may recover wages garnished by a judg ment creditor within the ninety-day preference period. The bankruptcy court, answering this question in the affirmative, held that the debtor, Kenneth W. Stine, was entitled to recover $1,064.05 that Nati-onsBank had obtained from him pursuant to wage attachments. I find that Stine may avoid the garnishments as preferential transfers but that he must count the $1,064.05…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Humphrey v. Herridge (In Re Humphrey)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1993
- Smoot v. Swann Hill Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n (In Re Smoot)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bank of America v. StineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Selby v. Allfirst Bank (In Re Selby)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Susquehanna Financial v. Norcia (In Re Norcia)District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- In Re: Kenneth W. Stine, Debtor, Kenneth W. Stine v. NationsbankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004