Legal Opinion

Ivey v. Blum

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. James Q,. Smith. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.

Prior to 1843 the statute of 1802 was the only statute barring an entry into lands, or limiting actions for their recovery; with the exception of a special statute, enacted in 1816, and applicable only to claims to lands which originated under the Spanish or French governments while they had dominion over a part of the State, and which were subject to confirmation and adjustment by Congress. Clay’s Dig. 328, § 87. The 7th section of the act of *1731802 was borrowed from the English statute, 21st Jac. I. c. 16, (to be found in Angelí on Limitations, 5th ed., App. 3,) and was not, in terms, a'…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rawls v. Doe ex dem. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  2. Henry v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  3. Doe ex dem. Nickles v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  4. Collins v. Doe ex dem. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  5. Doe ex dem. Hallett v. ForestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Bussey v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Theis v. Board of County Com'rs of Beaver CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Betz v. MullinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  5. Morrissett v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API