Legal Opinion

United States v. Senft

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 15, 1921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Criminal prosecution by the United States against George Senft. On motion to set aside verdict and for new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

GARVIN, District Judge.

This is a motion to set aside the verdict of a jury and for a new trial. The defendant has been convicted of the crime of bribing one Daly, an officer of the United States. After the jury had rendered its verdict, and before sentence had been imposed, the court was advised that Daly, an important witness for the government, had just been indicted by a federal grand jury in the Western district of New York upon the charge of extortion. This court thereupon imposed sentence, extended the term, and granted a stay of execution of sentence, in order that the defendant might…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. FridayNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miguel Moran Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. SoblenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. SegelmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. United States v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API