Legal Opinion

Robinson v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1984No. A015135PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

We J. that a purported release agreement required as a condition of entry to a racing event is unenforceable because it is printed in five-and-one-half-point type and cannot be easily read by persons of ordinary vision. Contained in two documents, a sign-in sheet and pit pass, the purported release is also unenforceable because it is unclear, not explicit and so lengthy and convoluted that it is not comprehensible.

Marie A. Robinson, as conservator for Robert Rudolph Link, appeals from a summary judgment granted by the Santa Clara County Superior Court in favor of defendants,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Elite InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Jarrett v. AllState InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Celli v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Ferrell v. Southern Nevada Off-Road Enthusiasts, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Dorman v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Westlye v. Look Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Hulsey v. Elsinore Parachute CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Frittelli, Inc. v. 350 North Canon Drive, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Harustak v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API