Legal Opinion

Naim v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1983No. 67646, 67647PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

These are appeals from convictions of the offense of aggravated robbery; the punishment in cause number 67,646 is imprisonment for 99 years and in cause number 67,647 imprisonment for 50 years.

The sole ground of error presented is the same in each appeal. The appellant asserts that the charge of the trial court was fundamentally erroneous in that it authorized conviction for conduct which was not a violation of law.

The appellant does not complain about the court’s charge in which the law is applied to the facts, but he urges that since the trial court delivered an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rohlfing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Bright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Coit v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1982
  5. Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hudson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  4. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API