Legal Opinion

Heidt v. Rome Memorial Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied in part the motions and cross motion of all defendants except Rory Tropp, M.D. (defendants) seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There are issues of fact concerning the alleged negligence of defendants in their failure to diagnose the infant and to provide appropriate treatment. “Battered child syndrome” is an accepted medical diagnosis (see, People v Henson, 33 NY2d 63, 73-74), and a medical malpractice action may be premised upon a failure to diagnose it (see, Landeros v Flood, 17 Cal 3d 399, 551 P2d 389).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kush v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. HensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Landeros v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Bell v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Levitt v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Page v. MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. E.P. ex rel. Portenier v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  3. BL Doe 2 v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  4. BL Doe 4 v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  5. Visiko v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API