Weed v. Brazill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiffs, Lila Morrison Weed and another, infants, by Elizabeth Clark, their guardian ad litem, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 28th day of January, 1920, as resettled by an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 13th day of February, 1920, staying the trial of the issues in the ejectment action brought by the children of Thomas M. Weed against…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the plaintiffs, Lila Morrison Weed and another, infants, by Elizabeth Clark, their guardian ad litem, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 28th day of January, 1920, as resettled by an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 13th day of February, 1920, staying the trial of the issues in the ejectment action brought by the children of Thomas M. Weed against Manuel Joseph Brazill until the trial of the equitable issues in the action brought by Brazill to establish his title to…
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, J.:
It follows from the reasoning in Brazill v. Weed (192 App. Div. 66) that this order was properly issued, and should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Dowling, Laughlin and Merrell, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brazill v. WeedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leonard v. Tatum & Dalton Transfer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Hot Blast Coal Co. v. WilliaxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
- Bosco v. Boston StoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923