Legal Opinion
Dique v. New Jersey State Police
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 6, 2010No. 05-1159, 08-2525PublishedCited by 449 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the question of when Walter Dique’s Fourteenth Amendment selective-enforcement claim accrued. Dique appeals the District Court’s final order, granting summary judgment in favor of Clinton Pagano, John Mulvey, and Glen Vona (Officers) on his claim because it was time barred. Dique argues that he timely filed suit because his claim accrued in April 2002, when his conviction was vacated; the Officers, by contrast, argue that the claim accrued in January 1990, when the wrongful conduct occurred.
In Gibson v. Superintendent of New Jersey Department of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by449 opinions
- Tony Fisher v. Jordan HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- Brightwell v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Joan Mullin v. Karen BalickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Estate Frank P. Lagano v. Bergen County Prosecutors OffiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Don Karns v. Kathleen ShanahanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
444 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.