Legal Opinion

Neeley v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF MO., DIV. OF EMP. SEC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1964No. 23916PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMUEL A. DEW, Special Commissioner.

The claimant, Mrs. Dorothy Neeley, an employee of the respondent Southwestern Bell Telephone Company at Jefferson City, Missouri, applied for and obtained- from her employer what was termed a “leave of absence” for one year because of her pregnancy. After the birth of her child and about six months before the expiration of the leave of absence, the claimant inquired of the Company if it had work for her and was told that there was none at the time. About six weeks before the expiration of the leave of absence she again applied to the Company for return to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Producers Produce Co. v. Industrial Commission of Missouri Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Bussmann Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Poggemoeller v. Industrial Com'n, Div. of Emp. SEC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1963

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pulitzer Publishing Co. v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  3. Division of Employment Security v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Wimberly v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  5. Crawford v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API