Calhoun v. Bechtel/Parsons/Brinckerhoff
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P.J.
This action is based upon the plaintiffs claim that because of their contractual obligations in connection with the Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel project (the “Project”), perhaps better known as the “Big Dig,” the defendants are liable for personal injuries she suffered from a fall on a defective sidewalk. Summary judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff has appealed pursuant to Dist/Mun. Cts. RAD.A, Rule 8C.
Defendant Bechtel/Parsons/Brinckerhoff (“Bechtel”) is a limited partnership formed for the purpose of serving as construction manager of the Project…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Oliveri v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Parent v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- A. John Cohen Ins. Agency v. Middlesex Ins. Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Sahagan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Diekan v. BlackwelderMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011