Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Bechtel/Parsons/Brinckerhoff

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 6, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P.J.

This action is based upon the plaintiffs claim that because of their contractual obligations in connection with the Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel project (the “Project”), perhaps better known as the “Big Dig,” the defendants are liable for personal injuries she suffered from a fall on a defective sidewalk. Summary judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff has appealed pursuant to Dist/Mun. Cts. RAD.A, Rule 8C.

Defendant Bechtel/Parsons/Brinckerhoff (“Bechtel”) is a limited partnership formed for the purpose of serving as construction manager of the Project…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Oliveri v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Parent v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. A. John Cohen Ins. Agency v. Middlesex Ins. Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Sahagan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Diekan v. BlackwelderMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API