Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Stutz v. Conboy

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn J. O’Brien, J.

These four habeas corpus proceedings have been commenced by relators who pleaded guilty to misdemeanors and were found by the court to be narcotic addicts. Each has been certified to the Narcotic Addiction Control Commission (hereafter N. A. C. C.) and has been held for treatment at the Great Meadow Correctional Institution. The proceedings have been consolidated for trial before me.

In these proceedings, they jointly contend that they should not have been committed to Great Meadow, where the treatment *792is for crimes, whereas they should receive treatment for drug addiction as a disease or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Blunt v. Narcotic Addiction Control CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People ex rel. Baker v. Narcotic Addiction Control CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Sanchez v. ZelkerNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People ex rel. Pettaway v. ZelkerNew York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API