Legal Opinion

Bridgestone/Firestone v. Aldridge

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1997No. 82375Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

Docket No. 82375–Agenda 34–May 1997.

BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., Appellee, v. CECIL ALDRIDGE et al ., Appellants.

Opinion filed October 23, 1997.

2Opinion of the Court · FreemanChief Justice Freeman

Section 604 of the Illinois Unemployment Insurance Act disqualifies an employee from receiving unemployment benefits where the employee is voluntarily unemployed because of a labor strike at the place where he or she was “last employed.” 820 ILCS 405/604 (West 1994). In Dienes v. Holland , 78 Ill. 2d 8 (1979), this court interpreted the phrase “last employed” to mean simply last in time.

This appeal requires us to ascertain whether the legislature…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Solich v. George & Anna Portes Cancer Prevention Center of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Belfield v. CoopIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Burke v. 12 Rothschild's Liquor Mart, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API