Legal Opinion
Big Baby Co. v. Schecter
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 18, 1993No. 92 Civ. 8743 (VLB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
I
This is a suit for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,150,811 covering a carton intended to enclose and to protect plastic juice containers. Issues presented include whether or not the invention claimed was sufficiently novel and nonobvious to be patentable under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101-103, and if so, whether the patent was infringed.
Plaintiffs (“patentees”) have moved to stay a related action in the District of Massachusetts, Up & Adam, Inc. v. Henry Kelston et al., 92-12738H, which was filed November 16, 1992 by Up and Adam, Inc., the corporate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ve Holding Corporation v. Johnson Gas Appliance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Universal City Studios, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. And Nintendo of America, Inc., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Cvd, Incorporated v. Raytheon Company, and Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Datasouth Computer Corp. v. Three Dimensional Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nutrition & Fitness, Inc. v. Blue Stuff, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2003
- Sluys v. HandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Rankin County Economic Development District (In Re New York Trap Rock Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Morrison Law Firm v. Clarion Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Max Planck Gesellschaft Zur Foederung Der Wissenschaften, E v. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994