Kennedy v. Hall
New York Supreme Court
Motion to cancel a notice of pendency of action by depositing a sum of money or giving an undertaking.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
The prayer of the complaint is not only that the plaintiff have a lien upon the real property in suit for the amount of his deposit, etc., but that in case the defendant becomes able to convey good title he be directed to specifically perform the contract. Since something more" than the payment of a sum of money is asked the Us pendens should not be canceled by a deposit of money or by the giving of an undertaking pursuant to section 1671 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Tishman v. Acritelli, 111 App. Div. 237; Schenkein v. Horowitz, 51 Misc. Rep. 80. It is urged by the defendant, however,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tishman v. AcritelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Bresel v. BrowningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Schenkein v. HorowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of New York v. Alleged Unsafe BuildingNew York Supreme Court · 1907