Legal Opinion

Seaborn v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided July 28, 2009No. 1788081PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER, III, Judge.

George J. Seaborn was convicted of operating a motor vehicle after being adjudged an habitual offender. Code § 46.2-357. On appeal, he contends the evidence was insufficient to prove he drove on a highway. Concluding that the evidence permitted such a finding, we affirm.

“On appeal, “we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’ ” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 1, 11, 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va.App. 438, 443, 358 S.E.2d 415,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  2. McGee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  3. Archer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  4. Kelly v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  5. Bolden v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kim v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  2. Richard Daniel Peters, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016
  3. China Michael-Lee Coleman v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2026
  4. Lorena Rodriguez Villareal, s/k/a Lorena Rodriguez-Villareal v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
  5. Loudoun County v. PlowmanLoudoun County Circuit Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API