Seaborn v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER, III, Judge.
George J. Seaborn was convicted of operating a motor vehicle after being adjudged an habitual offender. Code § 46.2-357. On appeal, he contends the evidence was insufficient to prove he drove on a highway. Concluding that the evidence permitted such a finding, we affirm.
“On appeal, “we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’ ” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 1, 11, 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (quoting Martin v. Commonwealth, 4 Va.App. 438, 443, 358 S.E.2d 415,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- McGee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Archer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Kelly v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Bolden v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kim v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Richard Daniel Peters, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016
- China Michael-Lee Coleman v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2026
- Lorena Rodriguez Villareal, s/k/a Lorena Rodriguez-Villareal v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
- Loudoun County v. PlowmanLoudoun County Circuit Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.