Legal Opinion

Marler v. Parker

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 2, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buford, C.J.-

-In this case defendants in error were plaintiffs in the court below and plaintiffs in error were defendants in the court below. Plaintiffs filed suit against John J. RudMn, Helen M. Rudkin, his wife, Orange Belt Realty Company, a corporation, R. M. Marler and L. P. Broadfield. During the progress of the suit Broadfield. died and Marietta Broadfield as Executrix of the estate of L. P. Broadfield was substituted as a party defendant. The suit was brought to recover indebtedness due to the plaintiffs evidenced by a note and mortgage securing the same executed by the Rudkins and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Slottow v. Hull Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Robson v. O'TooleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riddle v. ColliverSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. In Re JordanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1996
  3. McMullen, Et Ux. v. Inland Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. United States v. WigtonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
  5. Yates v. St. Johns Beach Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API