Legal Opinion

Lapensky v. Gordon

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam T. Cowin, J.

Plaintiff seeks to perpetuate her own testimony. She has served a notice to take her own deposition which defendant here moves to vacate. Plaintiff cross-moves for leave to take such deposition, claiming that she is 72 years of age, was very seriously injured in the accident which is the basis of this action, and that she wants to protect her rights in the event she does not survive the trial.

Admittedly, section 288 of the Civil Practice Act made specific provisions for the perpetuation of testimony, to wit: ‘ ‘ Any party to an action in a court of record may cause to be taken by deposition,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. SiefkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Kall v. KarelasNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Devoe v. King Kullen Grocery Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Trotter v. BrevoortNew York Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shaw v. Hospital Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API