Legal Opinion
State v. Roque
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 1977No. 2961PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of robbery while armed with a deadly weapon, defendant appeals. Numerous issues listed in the docketing statement were not briefed and are deemed abandoned. State v. Vogenthaler, 89 N.M. 150, 548 P.2d 112 (Ct.App.1976). We discuss the issues that were briefed. They are: (1) validity of the indictment; (2) enhancement of sentence; and (3) instructions, both given and refused.
Validity of the Indictment
The indictment is headed “Crime: ROBBERY WHILE ARMED WITH A DEADLY WEAPON (Firearm Enhancement)”. The body of the indictment reads:
“That on or about the 15th day…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. VogenthalerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. HamiltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. GuruleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Santiago Tapia v. Robert TansyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- State v. PierceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Ronald Beachum v. Robert TansyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- State v. BurdexNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. BurdexNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.