Legal Opinion

People v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1958No. Crim. 3450PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

A jury found defendant guilty of burglary of the second degree, he was committed to the Youth Authority, and now appeals from the judgment. Appellant concedes that he unlawfully entered the store in question. His entire defense is that he did so without any intent to commit larceny, and thus is not guilty of burglary as defined in Penal Code, section 459. He testified that he had an argument that evening with his fiancée, that he was “mad at the world” and entered the store only to “tear the place apart, to wreck it, destroy it.”

Appellant requested the following instruction:

“You are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. TallmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. MulkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API