Legal Opinion
City of Pasadena v. State Ex Rel. City of Houston
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1969No. B-1013PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Houston’s motion for rehearing is granted. We withdraw our original opinion and substitute this one for it.
The State of Texas, upon the relation of the City of Houston and others, instituted this quo warranto action to oust the City of Pasadena from certain territory which both cities claim they have annexed. Houston contends that it enacted an ordinance in 1963 and a group of other ordinances in 1965 which were earlier in time than Pasadena’s 1965 annexation ordinances. Houston says that their annexation ordinances rendered the lands involved in the Pasadena ordinances…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pan American Production Co. v. City of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Beyer v. Templeton, County JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Irving v. Dallas County Flood Control DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- City of Irving v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- City of Galena Park v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- City of Clute v. City of Lake JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- City of West Lake Hills v. State Ex. Rel. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Gulf Maritime Warehouse Co. v. Towers, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1993
- Rio Grande Valley Gas Co. v. City of Pharr, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- City of Waco v. City of McGregorTexas Supreme Court · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.