Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Borough of Frenchtown

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided September 14, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONLEY, J.T.C.

This action presents an unusual farmland assessment issue involving honeybees and the production of honey. Plaintiff filed an application with the Frenehtown tax assessor seeking to have a tract of land assessed as qualified farmland for the tax year 1983. The basis of the claim was that the land was *560actively devoted to the production of honey through the efforts of a professional beekeeper and his bees. The assessor denied the application on the grounds that beehives were located on only a small portion of plaintiffs land and that in fact the bees did not gather their nectar…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of East Orange v. TP. OF LIVINGSTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. The CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. Township of LivingstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  3. Tp. of Andover v. KymerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Green Pond Corp. v. Township of RockawayNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
  5. Centex Homes of New Jersey, Inc. v. Manalapan TownshipNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wyer v. Middletown TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
  2. Brighton v. Rumson BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 2005
  3. Atlantic Coast LEH, LLC v. Township of Little Egg HarborNew Jersey Tax Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API