Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1867PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Walker. The case was tried before Hon. James R. Hennaed, one of the district judges.

1Opinion of the CourtDonley, J.

Exeptions were taken in the court below to the indictment, as being insufficient, because, as alleged, *190it did not appear from the proceedings of the court that any indictment was presented against the defendant at the spring term of the court, 1866, or since then; that it does not appear from the proceedings of the court that the style of this cause has heen entered in said court; and because there is no legal presentment of any indictment against him. At the same time the district attorney filed a motion to amend the record, which motion appears to have been sustained. The record does not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burnett v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hannon v. HensonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Ex parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Ximenes v. XimenesTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Glasser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API