Pennsylvania Cement Co. v. Bradley Contracting Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
This case turns upon the law of New York, involving as it does real property situated in that state. Thorley v. Pabst Brewing Co., 179 F. 338, 102 C. C. A. 522 (C. C. A. 2). It is the settled law of that state, following the English rule, that, pending the term, a lessor may not recover the cost of repairs upon default by the lessee upon a covenant to keep the tenement in repair, but is confined to the difference in value of the reversion. Appleton v. Marx, 191 N. Y. 81, 83 N. E. 563, 14 Ann. Cas. 150, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 210. At the expiration of the term…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Appleton v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Thorley v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Susswein v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
- Kanter v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Kanter v. . New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ceres Terminals, Inc. v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Missouri Baptist Hospital v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- William K. Bowes, Edwin L. Bowes, Franklin B. Bowes, Marion R. Bowes, Kathryn B. Clark and Mary B. Diehl v. Saks & Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Ed Miller & Sons, Inc. v. EarlNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Avalon Pacific-Santa Ana, L.P. v. HD Supply Repair & Remodel, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.