The Daniel McAllister
District Court, E.D. New York
In Admiralty. Suits for collision by John D. Lohman, owner of the barge Lohman, and by Charles H. Castle, owner of the steam canal boat Haines, against the steam tug Daniel McAllister.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIELD, District Judge.
This action arose from a progressive series of incidents which nearly swept the river front of shipping from the Manhattan Bridge northward on the New York side for a space of 12 to 14 piers. One action is brought by the owner of the Lohman, which was lying in the slip between Piers 31 and 32, and which during the. strong flood tide was taken out by the tug McAllister in order to be placed at a berth a short distance up the river. The captain of the McAllister intended to perform this maneuver by snubbing around the outer end of Pier 31, or by holding his tug against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- DepewCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- Wright & Cobb Lighterage Co. v. New England Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1911
- The AllemaniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Cambria S. S. Co. v. Pittsburgh S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The New York Central No. 18Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919