Legal Opinion

People v. Suber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion for a severance. Where, as here, “proof against the defendants is supplied by the same evidence, only the most cogent reasons warrant a severance” (People v Bornholdt, 33 NY2d 75, 87, cert denied sub nom. Victory v New York, 416 US 905). The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request for an order requiring the appearance of the identifying witness at the Wade hearing. Defendant’s contention that the witness would have testified that the identification procedure was unduly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. People v. BornholdtNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. People v. BeaversAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MaderaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. SholtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API