Legal Opinion
In re Chrystol B.
New York City Family Court
Decided June 3, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edith Miller, J.
On April 10, 1980, upon the annexed affirmation of the Law Guardian to the children herein and upon all prior pleadings and proceedings, the Commissioner of Social Services was directed to show cause why the court should not issue an order directing the commissioner pursuant to section 255 of the Family Court Act and section 398 of the Social Services *889Law to reinstate to the respondent mother herein a welfare rent budget for five persons as previously provided by the Department of Social Services and in addition to provide for supplemental moneys to cover…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bernstein v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re Lorie C.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Seitelman v. LavineNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- First Trust & Deposit Co. v. GoodrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re J. J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Portugal v. WebbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re Nicole JJ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re Lashawnda M.New York City Family Court · 1982
- Matter of JJDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.