Legal Opinion

Tilly v. Bauman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 1, 1932No. 30872PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

Plaintiff foreclosed on a mortgage note signed by one Bauman, owner of certain real estate in the city of Shreveport. Bauman had contracted with one White to build upon said property. Plaintiff advanced the money to the builder, and held the note as security for his advancements. The property was after-wards transferred to the Washburn Land Company. The contractor defaulted in the building, leaving numerous unpaid liens upon it. Washburn Land Company attempted to bring concursus proceedings. Plaintiff was not satisfied to await the outcome of those proceedings, and proceeded to do that which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hortman-Salmen Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pringle-Associated Mortgage Corporation v. EanesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  2. Pringle Associated Mortgage Corporation v. EanesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Martin v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas. Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Franklin Life Ins. v. HillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Pringle-Associated Mortgage Corporation v. EanesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API