Allen v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellant Claude Bernard Allen appeals from his convictions by a jury of manslaughter while armed and carrying a pistol without a license, D.C.Code §§ 22-2405, -3202, -3204 (1989 Repl.), on the grounds first, that his Confrontation Clause rights were violated by the admission of inadmissible hearsay evidence offered to show the state of mind of the decedent and that a cautionary instruction was insufficient to cure the harm, and second, that the prosecutor made improper use of missing witness and missing evidence inferences during closing argument. We find neither…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Freeland v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.